Skip to main content

Activity 4 - Blog Reflection on "Instructional Design Model"

For this week's reflection blog, we are to find an instructional design (ID) model that we are not familiar with and answer some questions.  I had never heard of the ASSURE model, is a six-step ID Model that provides a way to successfully integrate media and technology in the student learning process.  ASSURE is an acronym that stands for:

  • A - Analyze learning
  • S – State standards & objectives
  • S – Select strategies, technology, media & materials
  • U – Utilize technology, media & materials
  • R – Require learner participation
  • E – Evaluate & revise
What is the point of this model?

This model uses Robert Gagne’s events of instruct to assure effective use of media in instruction and its main point is that learners attributes, such as age, gender, interests, academic abilities, learning styles, prior competencies, etc. are first analyzed prior to creating any goals and objectives, strategies and technology media, and materials.

How is the model different from what you already know? How is it the same?

This model is different in that the first steps starts at looking at the learners in detail.  In this model, teachers are required to assess the students’ knowledge prior to instruction.  The purpose is for the teachers to understand where learns’ knowledge and skills are at the start of the instruction.  


Is this model something you may use? Why or why not?

I find this model very interesting and I would consider it if I were a face-to-face teacher as it would allow me to evaluate my students early on in the semester/school year.  Although I don’t know how feasible it would be to first assess the students and then have ‘the time’ to designing or plan learning instructions.  I’m not sure in what type of setting this would work for both the learners and the instructor.

How is an ID model different from a theoretical model (i.e. social constructivism)? Why is this distinction important?  

A learning theory describes how people learn new ideas and new concepts.  Two learning theories that are very popular are the Behaviorist theory and the Constructivist theory.  ID models are the guidelines/methods/strategies/structure/applications on how learning content is presented.  Some examples of ID models include the ADDIE model, the SAM model, and the Dick and Carey model among many.  ID models are based on learning theories.  

Do you think such a differentiation will matter for a client?

I think it would make a difference in certain situations.  One that comes to mind is if a teacher is doing tutoring or remediation in which assessing what the students knows or doesn’t know would be beneficial.  

References

Mullins, K (2014).  Experiences from the process of designing lessons with interactive whiteboard: ASSURE as a road map.  The Journal of Academic Librarianship, (40), 339-38.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 13 - Activity 5

What is left to do? Since I wrote my last blog I have made some small changes to my course.  I have made some small revisions to the modules to clean up the content a bit more.  I also finalized a couple of handouts that I had left incomplete.  I also changed my landing page and if time permits, I might change it again.  I need to go back and review all my course links and make sure they are all still active and opening the right pages.  Once I get these done, I will try downloading my course and see how that process goes as I don’t want to wait until the final week to do this, in case I run into issues. What challenges have you faced?  Will you be able to meet your timeline for completion?  Why or why not? Will you be able to implement? Evaluate? I haven’t faced too many challenges other than trying to complete all the work before the end of the semester.  I have reached the point in my project where I need to be able to see any mistak...

Activity 3: Blog Reflection for Week 6

Reflect on the following items: You have begun putting together your full course. What has gone well? What has challenged you? What feedback have you received? What feedback have you given? What have you learned from the process of developing instruction in an LMS? I started putting my course together in week 5 as I am trying not to procrastinate in this class because from week 7 on, I will need to rely on my time management skills.   I am so used to the Blackboard environment so there has been a learning curve as far understanding the structure of Canvas.   I am still not sure how some things work in Canvas but I think I am learning a lot through the development of my course.   For me, there is nothing better than hands-on learning.   The one area I’ve had difficulty with is placing links.   Canvas doesn’t allow for the use of some links and I find that a bit annoying.   The workaround has been for me to create a content page and the...

Week 3 - Blog Reflection 2

For week 3, we were asked to reflect on our experience with the instructional design document and our peer review.  The main purpose of this reflection is to write about what we learned, the changes that took place due to our learning, and how we used the feedback.  I was dreading this assignment but one has no choice but to keep moving and doing our best. I have learned and grown a lot as an instructional designer this week.  Working on the instructional design document has been one of the most challenging and yet rewarding assignments I have ever worked on.  I say this because writing is a weakness of mine and because I have very little experience with the analysis phase of instructional design.  I had to work hard and put in a lot of hours just to get the analysis design document in decent shape.  I must admit, I had issues with just about every section of the analysis document. The area which I struggled the most was the goals and objectives....